gr 210318|Philippine Jurisprudence : Tagatay A sum of money received by an employee in behalf of an employer is considered to be only in the material possession of the employee. Notably, such material possession of an .
[Drum Solo] [Chorus] And I can feel it coming in the air tonight, oh Lord Well, I've been waiting for this moment for all my life, oh Lord I can feel it in the air tonight, oh Lord, oh Lord Well .
gr 210318,Therefore, as it now stands, a sum of money received by an employee in behalf of an employer is considered to be only in the material possession of the employee. Notably, .
Philippine Jurisprudence Decision 6 G.R. No. 210318 employee is adjunct, by reason of his employment, to .Decision 6 G.R. No. 210318 employee is adjunct, by reason of his employment, to a recognition of the juridical possession of the employer. As long as the juridical .People, G.R. No. 210318, July 28, 2020. [55] ARTICLE 22. Retroactive Effect of Penal Laws. — Penal laws shall have a retroactive effect in so far as they favor the person .G.R. No. 210318 July 28, 2020 Janice Reside y Tan vs. People of the Philippines A.M. No. RTJ-20-2584 July 28, 2020 Hortencia R. Cayabyab vs. Presiding Judge Irineo P. .A sum of money received by an employee in behalf of an employer is considered to be only in the material possession of the employee. Notably, such material possession of an .
People, G.R. No. 210318, July 28, 2020. [49] REV. PEN. CODE, Art. 308: Article 308. Who are liable for theft. - Theft is committed by any person who, with intent to gain but without . [1] 310 Phil. 21 (1995) [Per J. Vitug, En Banc]. [2] 335 Phil. 664 (1997) [Per J. Panganiban, En Banc]. [3] Rollo, pp. 8-450. [4] Id. at 71-90. The February 25, 2010 . Shortly after assuming office as the seventh President of the Republic of the Philippines after the successful People Power Revolution, then President Corazon C. .
Resolution 2 complainant in the aforementioned amount of P335,000.00. CONTRARY TO LAW. 6 G.R. No. 233218 March 15, 2023 Upon arraignment, petitioner entered a plea of .
DIFICATION. Accused-appellant Danica L. Medina is found guilty beyond reasonable doubt of estafa under-Article 315, paragraph l(b) of the Revised PenalcCode, as amended, and .
(1) year and eight _(8) months of prisiori correccional, a.
FIRST DIVISION [ G.R. No. 255632. July 25, 2023 ] DANICA L. MEDINA, PETITIONER, VS. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, RESPONDENT. D E C I S I O N. MELO, J.: In a few cases, this Court has modified convictions from estafa to qualified theft upon finding that the accused who took private property belonging to another did not have juridical .CRISANTO HAYA Y DELOS SANTOS, ACCUSED-APPELLANT. In a Resolution 1 dated August 1, 2018, the Court affirmed the Decision 2 dated August 17, 2016 of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA G.R. CR.-H.C. No. 06277 which upheld the conviction of Crisanto Haya y Delos Santos (accused-appellant) for violation of Sections 5 and 11, Article II of .Samsung QLED QE65Q70TA 65" Τηλεόραση Smart 4K TV. 210318. ( 13) Αξιολογήσεις. Ο ισχυρός 4K Quantum επεξεργαστής βελτιστοποιεί αυτόματα την εικόνα και προσφέρει μια πιο συναρπαστική εμπειρία στην 4K Smart τηλεόραση Samsung .en banc g.r. no. 221318 - kabataan party-list, represented by representative james mark terry l. ridon and marjohara s. tucay; sarah jane i. elago, president
Paz Cheng y Chu Vs. People of the Philippines, G.R. No. 174113, January 13, 2016. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Respondent. Assailed in this petition for review on certiorari 1 are the Decision 2 dated March 28, 2006 and the Resolution 3 dated June 26, 2006 of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. CR No. 24871, which affirmed the .
gr 210318Paz Cheng y Chu Vs. People of the Philippines, G.R. No. 174113, January 13, 2016. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Respondent. Assailed in this petition for review on certiorari 1 are the Decision 2 dated March 28, 2006 and the Resolution 3 dated June 26, 2006 of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. CR No. 24871, which affirmed the .
This is an appeal 1 filed by Lucille M. David (accused-appellant) from the Decision 2 dated January 16, 2017 of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. CR-HC No. 07816 that affirmed the Joint Judgment 3 dated September 15, 2015 of Branch 166, Regional Trial Court (RTC), Pasig City. The RTC found accused-appellant guilty beyond reasonable doubt of .
ASIA UNITED BANK, Respondents. We resolve the Motion for Reconsideration filed by petitioner-movants, Rafael H. Galvez and Katherine L. Guy in G.R. No. 187919, 1 and Gilbert G. Guy, Philip Leung and Eugenio H. Galvez, Jr. in G.R. No. 188030 2 addressed to our consilidated Decision dated 25 April 2012 3 finding probable cause to charge .
gr 210318|Philippine Jurisprudence
PH0 · epublic of tbe flbilippine% ~upreme ~ourt
PH1 · Philippine Jurisprudence
PH2 · People of the Philippines Vs. Rogelio Mendoza y Samson, et al.
PH3 · G.R. No. 224316
PH4 · G.R. No. 210318 (Case Digest)
PH5 · G.R. No. 210318
PH6 · G.R. No. 196359
PH7 · D E C I S I O N
PH8 · :J)lf[anila
PH9 · $,Upreme Qtourt